mibuso.com

Microsoft Business Solutions online community
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 5:19 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Hardware Guide for Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV 4.0 (Version 4)
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 1999 8:01 am
Posts: 1901
Location: Wilrijk, Belgium
Country: Belgium (be)
Hardware Sizing Guide for Navision up to 250 users
Ramcel Gatchalian and Patrice Dupont-Roc from the Asia Pacific Navision Support Team have successfully co-authored a whitepaper which provides hardware sizing for Navision Installations up to 250 users.

Please note: this is a v1.0 document and we very much welcome feedback / suggested corrections.

http://www.mibuso.com/dlinfo.asp?FileID=587

Discuss this download here.


Last edited by Administrator on Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:29 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:30 am 
Offline
MVP Microsoft Dynamics NAV

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 8703
Location: 3rd rock from sun
Country: United States (us)
Could somebody explain the following statement in the pdf document.
Quote:
It is possible to run two or more Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV Database Servers with the same database.



The picture on page 6 shows two servers connected to the same database. Is that possible?

_________________
Rashed.

blog: http://mibuso.com/blogs/ara3n/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 638
Location: Capelle a/d IJssel
Country: Netherlands (nl)
Yes, can't believe this will work. How does service A know if service B locks a table? Maybe the 2 services talk to one (1) server.exe or slave.exe?

_________________
Create dynamic Excel or Word documents, ReportX


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:24 pm
Posts: 2574
Location: MA
Country: United States (us)
I find this document rather vague and not very useful in its present format. Considering the vast choices available in hardware and the many configuration options, it would be helpful to have details on why these particular configurations were selected.

Why 2 processors in the 2 larger NAV DB systems. I thought the native server only supports 1 processor. Would not the money be better spend on upgrading the disk system?

Why Window Server Enterprise Edition in the larger NAV DB system? The standard edition will support the 4 GB of memory in this configuration. Again the money could be spend elsewhere. What is the reason for so much memory?

Why these particular disk configurations? When should you consider splitting the database? Are there any disk configurations to avoid?



That's all for now....

_________________
There are no bugs - only undocumented features.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:47 am
Posts: 1
Location: Niedersachsen
Country: Germany (de)
Hi,

is there also a document which describes the needs for more than 250 concurrent users on a single database?

We are evaluating Navision and the limitation of 250 users is for us to low if we decide to work with the software for more than a few years.

Regards
Franz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Hardware Guide for Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV 4.0 (Version 2)
PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:21 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 1999 8:01 am
Posts: 1901
Location: Wilrijk, Belgium
Country: Belgium (be)
Hardware Guide for Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV 4.0 (Version 2)
The whitepaper provides hardware sizing for Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV (version 4.0) installations.

The whitepaper goes into specific detail as to the exact hardware requirements for a variety of Dynamics™ NAV configurations.

Version 1 was released on April, 19 2006.
Version 2 is now available.

Change log between version 1 and version 2:
• Change the document title to “Hardware Guide”
• Modify the section “Purpose, Terms & Conditions” to add the official positioning for Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV
• Remove the section “Executive Summary”
• New section “Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV Client”
• New section “References”
• Remove the recommendations for above 100 concurrent users - except for Microsoft SQL Server 2005
• Clarify the limitations of the Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV Database Server (clustering, RAM and CPU)
• Clarify the use of dual-core processors
• Increase the memory recommendati ons for Microsoft SQL Server
• Modify the recommended drive letters for storage for all servers
• Modify the RAID recommendations and increase the storage requirements for the Microsoft SQL Server transaction logs (all database sizes)
• Clarify and detail the storage requirements for all servers

http://www.mibuso.com/dlinfo.asp?FileID=587

Discuss this download here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:36 am
Posts: 39
Location: DO
Country: Germany (de)
Hi there,

how do you argue the changes in V2 for the storage recommendation in the following example (or in all other sql server examples)?

Guide Version 1 Guide Version 2
19.04.2006 19.06.2006
medium Size medium Size
DATA 12 HDD Raid 0+1 6 HDD Raid 0+1
LOG 6 HDD Raid 0+1 14 HDD Raid 1

What should i say to our customers, who have both guides and ask me why MS now recommends a total different storage system than 2 month ago?

Thanks for your help

regards
tobias


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:24 pm 
Offline
MVP Microsoft Dynamics NAV

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:37 pm
Posts: 7931
Location: Howell, MI
Country: United States (us)
I have a hard time believing that these are official Microsoft recommendations....

_________________
Daniel Rimmelzwaan
MVP - Dynamics NAV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Modifications between version 1 and version 2
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:57 am
Posts: 8
Location: SYDNEY
Country: Australia (au)
Hi,

Between version 1 and version 2, the recommended total number of disks is almost the same. The way to organize them in RAID arrays is different.
In version 1 of the document, we did not specify database size limits in the storage section: this is why the disk requirements were exagerated in some situations (medium size segment especially).
In version 2, we decided to specify database size limits for the small and medium size segment. Therefore, we were able to fine tune the recommendations. Therefore if you are still in the medium size segment in terms of users but with a database of more than 80GB, you now fall into the large segment (14 disks).

We changed the RAID strategy for the log file as stripping is not really necessary when a file is read and written sequentially on the disk.

As specified on the cover of the document, this guide reflects mostly the view of the Dynamics NAV Microsoft Technical Support team for the Asia Pacific region. If you do not feel confident with it, you should double check with the support team in your own region.

Patrice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:10 pm 
Offline
MVP Microsoft Dynamics NAV

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:37 pm
Posts: 7931
Location: Howell, MI
Country: United States (us)
It's just that there have been benchmark tests for Navision by Microsoft and out of those tests it came that the correct RAID level is 1+0, not 0+1. There are significant performance differences between a mirrored striped array, and a striped array of mirrored pairs, and one is better for NAV than the other.

Also, in this hardware document you are recommending multiple processors for Navision Database Server, which is false information. It is simply not capable of using more than one processor.

Please consider my comments as constructive criticism, because I do really appreciate this document. We've been trying to get MSFT in our region to give us recommendations like this they will not commit to anything.

_________________
Daniel Rimmelzwaan
MVP - Dynamics NAV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:57 am
Posts: 8
Location: SYDNEY
Country: Australia (au)
:) No worries. Microsoft traditionally recommended for the NAV product RAID 0+1 instead of RAID10 in previously published documents and conferences. I guess it is because RAID 0+1 is more common with the low-end controllers than RAID 10 (“low-end” servers correspond more to the official target for the NAV product). Also RAID 10 is known to be more faults tolerant, but I do not think it makes a huge difference from a performance point of view. So go for RAID 01 or RAID 10 if you can!

Concerning the CPUs, we address this concern in version 2 of the document with some more detailed explanations. Since the server for a Small Business often hosts the Domain Controller, the Exchange server, the Anti-Virus server, the backup server and the NAV server, having more than 2 CPUs would definitely help even if NAV itself can only use 1. Same for the RAM.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:12 am 
Offline
MVP Microsoft Dynamics NAV

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 8703
Location: 3rd rock from sun
Country: United States (us)
Hello ofbridge
Could you explain this quote.
Quote:
It is possible to run two or more Microsoft Dynamics™ NAV Database Servers with the same database. With
this configuration you could have one server running TCP/IP and another one running NetBIOS on the
same database. All servers need to be installed on the same machine, and the limitations of the Microsoft
Dynamics™ NAV Database Server apply at the machine level:


Is this possible?

_________________
Rashed.

blog: http://mibuso.com/blogs/ara3n/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Two or More Servers, Same Database
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:57 am
Posts: 8
Location: SYDNEY
Country: Australia (au)
Yes. This is perfectly possible. The installation process is detailed on page 21 of the "Installation & System Management: Microsoft® Business Solutions–Navision® Database Server" guide on the product CD (Doc\w1w1ism.pdf) - section: "Two or More Servers, Same Database".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:51 pm 
Offline
MVP Microsoft Dynamics NAV

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 8703
Location: 3rd rock from sun
Country: United States (us)
I read the document and the catch is that it has to run from same folder. Which means you still have one slave.exe running which writes the data to the database. There is no info on what the advantages for this kind of setup. Anybody knows?

_________________
Rashed.

blog: http://mibuso.com/blogs/ara3n/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:29 am 
Offline
Moderator
MVP Microsoft Dynamics NAV
NAV TechDays 2013 attendee

Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:13 am
Posts: 7504
Location: Milan
Country: Italy (it)
ara3n wrote:
I read the document and the catch is that it has to run from same folder. Which means you still have one slave.exe running which writes the data to the database. There is no info on what the advantages for this kind of setup. Anybody knows?

I think it is in case you have some PC's working with Netbios and others with TCP/IP. With this trick you are not forced to change the network-setup of those PC's. But this is VERY old stuff.
Now the standard is TCP/IP. The Netbios is still there for backward-compatibility. (Is there actually someone who still uses this?)

_________________
Regards,Alain Krikilion
Use the SEARCH,Luke! || No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title! || Read Forum Rules before making a posting


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum


Search for:
Jump to: