mibuso.com

Microsoft Business Solutions online community
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 4:20 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:54 pm
Posts: 15
Country: Malaysia (my)
Anyone know that, can Navision handle FIFO in warehouse module?

Thanks :)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 792
Location: India
Country: India (in)
What do you mean by FIFO for warehouse? Could you be more clear about it?

_________________
Vijay Gupta
Changing the code is last step. Try to change processes first...


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 11:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:54 pm
Posts: 15
Country: Malaysia (my)
Now what I try to do is, control the stock in FIFO manner. Oldest stock will ship out first, compare with new one.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 3:04 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Armenia, Quindio
Country: Colombia (co)
Are you using directed put away and pick? Are you using Lot Tracked inventory with expiration dates including in the warehouse?
If so then it really is a manual process without a modification. When looking up on the lot numbers from a pick, the soonest to expire will be listed first. Other than that you would need to make a modification or look for an add-on.

_________________
Gerry Kistler
KCP Consultores


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 1:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:24 pm
Posts: 2574
Location: MA
Country: United States (us)
Can you define what you mean by "oldest stock"? As stated above, the system does support FEFO (first expiring - first out) but we shouldn't assume that is your intent. You could mean first received, or first produced, etc.

_________________
There are no bugs - only undocumented features.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 6:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:54 pm
Posts: 15
Country: Malaysia (my)
gerrykistler wrote:
Are you using directed put away and pick? Are you using Lot Tracked inventory with expiration dates including in the warehouse?
If so then it really is a manual process without a modification. When looking up on the lot numbers from a pick, the soonest to expire will be listed first. Other than that you would need to make a modification or look for an add-on.


Yeap, I set to directed put-away & pick, but I not using lot tracked inventory.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 6:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:54 pm
Posts: 15
Country: Malaysia (my)
bbrown wrote:
Can you define what you mean by "oldest stock"? As stated above, the system does support FEFO (first expiring - first out) but we shouldn't assume that is your intent. You could mean first received, or first produced, etc.


The "oldest stock" i mean here is the stock which first received.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 3:04 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Armenia, Quindio
Country: Colombia (co)
Without using Lot Tracking then there is no link to the physical goods to the system. Even if you had a way to use FIFO in the warehouse there would be no way for the user to identify the physical stock to what the system used. An alternative would be to use Lot Tracking and make the receipt the lot. Otherwise I do not see the logic in what you are trying to do.

_________________
Gerry Kistler
KCP Consultores


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 4:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:54 pm
Posts: 15
Country: Malaysia (my)
gerrykistler wrote:
Without using Lot Tracking then there is no link to the physical goods to the system. Even if you had a way to use FIFO in the warehouse there would be no way for the user to identify the physical stock to what the system used. An alternative would be to use Lot Tracking and make the receipt the lot. Otherwise I do not see the logic in what you are trying to do.


Actually now I trying to use bin ranking to control FIFO of stock, but after I tested few transactions; this method is doesn't work. If use lot tracking, mean physical stock have to stick lot no. sticker, right?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 4:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:24 pm
Posts: 2574
Location: MA
Country: United States (us)
You seem to be describing a need to manage stock rotation. First, don't expect the system to do everything for you. My sugegstion would be to leverage your bin naming sequence and ranking to control the order in which bins are picked. Then manage a stock rotation process to move older stock to the high priority pick bins. Internal Picks and Put-Away could help out here.

I don't see the need to lot numbers to accomplish stock rotation.

_________________
There are no bugs - only undocumented features.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 3:04 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Armenia, Quindio
Country: Colombia (co)
Bbrown is correct and even with using Directed Put Away and Pick with forward picking bins, you can never control the physical rotation of stock in the system. The best you can hope for is to assist with it but physically you can always have older items sitting in the bottom of a bin or the back of a shelf that never get moved to the forward picking bins. The only way outside of Lot Numbers to manage stock rotation is through good procedures and employees who follow them.

_________________
Gerry Kistler
KCP Consultores


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Navision FIFO
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:54 pm
Posts: 15
Country: Malaysia (my)
bbrown wrote:
You seem to be describing a need to manage stock rotation. First, don't expect the system to do everything for you. My sugegstion would be to leverage your bin naming sequence and ranking to control the order in which bins are picked. Then manage a stock rotation process to move older stock to the high priority pick bins. Internal Picks and Put-Away could help out here.

I don't see the need to lot numbers to accomplish stock rotation.


Thanks for your reply "bbrown"

Ya..this is what I doing now.
1.) Naming bin in sequence (by rack, by level, by bin no.). eg:A1-L1-1
2.) Set bin ranking (first bin of lowest level, will set to highest ranking).

The problem is, whenever item in higher ranking bin is empty, store hand have to physically move older stock to the higher ranking bin; and system have to do internal movement too.

Base on the solution above, its will increase the miss locate problem and increase the work load.
So I was try to find the solution to minimize the movement within warehouse, in order to minimize problem occur.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum


Search for:
Jump to: